The Place of Public Service Broadcasting

Dear Steve Jobs campaign to promote the SVT App.

The concept of public service has been a central element of broadcasting culture in most national contexts right from the off. Yet current trends in media technology, governance and ownership present challenges to long-standing notions of the role of public service broadcasting. This was the basis for a conference, The Place of Public Service Broadcasting: Transnationalism, Localism and Identity in the Digital Age, at York University on 4 July.

Public service broadcasting has become increasingly under threat due to the advent of digital distribution, the expansion of bandwidth, and, arguably, the diminishing importance of the national as a locus of identity for broadcasters and audiences. Most significantly for me, digital media has blurred the boundaries of producer and consumer, challenging the dominance of treasured institutions such as the BBC as sole producers of knowledge. Throw in infinite choice and highly personalised content and we might as well issue a P45 to the once heralded ‘mass audience’.

I attended the gloriously modern Department of Theatre, Film and Television for an industry panel discussion on these issues with Hilary Perkins and Colin Ward. Hilary is a Digital Executive Producer and Creative Consultant. She’s got a CV that’ll turn you green with jealousy, and was responsible for commissioning interactive media experiences to complement flagship drama on C4 and E4, such as Skins, Misfits and Shameless. If you’re thinking of embarking on a digital storytelling project, seek her out. Colin Ward has extensive experience of working in children’s media production and gave a really passionate talk, backed with scary facts, about the diminishing production of British based children’s programmes. The panel was Chaired by James Bennett (Royal Holloway).

My talk focussed on my experiences of working as one of 53 commissioned artists on The Space. The talk could and should have been a lot better but unfortunately I hadn’t prepared anything as I wrongly presumed we would just be debating issues. I had to wing it, which shouldn’t be a problem, but in the presence of such interesting figures I think I let myself down a bit.

The Space was an incredible experience which has influenced the way I think about storytelling in so many different ways. One of our main remits was to think about how to diversify content for media platforms and to reach niche audiences. This conference gave context to this remit and made me realise how and why this project was funded: organisations like the Beeb are fighting for their life. I hope they win that battle.

One issue I didn’t talk about, or at least I don’t think I did, was the way The Space tried to create a platform for arts organisations to broaden their reach. If the BBC/Arts Council can continue to do this (a new round of funding has been announced) then they still have a valuable role to play in modern life. Everybody may have the ability to publish their ideas but that doesn’t necessarily guarantee people will see it. The BBC, perhaps as a curator, still has the power to draw this content together and make it visible.

There were loads of interesting talks that day but I particularly enjoyed Pernilla Severson (Malmo University) discussion on social media engaging fan-based social network practices. She gave a case study of 2009 campaign by Swedish television to promote an SVT App. The campaign was superb and yet another example of the power of engaging the public through social media. Check out Dear Steve Jobs and learn…

Conference blog

Even the Puppies

Photo by Pixabay.

Recently I’ve made more space in the reviews section of WriteLion for self-published authors. It fits with the LeftLion ethos to support the underdog, although the underdog does bark a little too much for my liking. Increasingly I find self-published authors find it very difficult to take criticism which can lead to endless streams of emails conversations that I simply can’t be arsed with.

In Issue 52 of LeftLion we reviewed Anthony Scott’s On Ashover Hill. Anthony was a little disappointed with the review but fortunately he dealt with it in a professional manner, sharing his thoughts via his website and Twitter. This has created a constructive dialogue and has made me think about the process of reviewing for self-published authors.

Unfortunately for Anthony his book was given to the best read reviewer I have and so any faults in his text were likely to be magnified due to the sheer breadth and scope of her reading. This has raised a difficult ethical question: should I have matched his book up with someone who mostly reads self-published work or should all books be judged purely on the merit of their words? And is it fair to clump all self-published novels under one banner alongside the likes of Amanda Hocking?

Wherever possible I find the most appropriate person to review specific genres. In this instance I went for a reviewer who could deal with a non-linear narrative and had no problem gobbling up 385 pages without breaking sweat as another realistic concern is ensuring reviewers meet copy deadlines.

One thing self-published authors should bear in mind is that they’ve completed and published a book. Without wishing to sound patronising, that’s an achievement in itself. It’s not our intention at LeftLion to ruin people’s lives. If a reviewer completely slagged off a book I simply wouldn’t run with it. There’s only enough room on this planet for one Julie Burchill.

As it happens I felt Anthony’s review was fair as it pointed out what the reviewer disliked as well as an awareness of what other readers may enjoy. Take this line: ‘Each chapter led up to a climax that was left unanswered, which frustrated rather than intrigued this reader, though the romantic fiction audience it targets will no doubt be more forgiving.’ That’s a pretty succinct précis as far as I’m concerned.

At the end of the day if a book gets reviewed in the magazine it means it has done something right. It is also worth noting that ultimately all reviews are subjective. When authors are unhappy with a review all I can do is offer to include an extract of their book online. This way the reader can judge whether the book is worth purchasing. I’m sure Anthony will take me up on this offer. I just wish other self-published authors were equally professional.