Bletchley Park: AI, Diversity, and Anonymity

Bletchley Park county estate was the secret codebreaking headquarters during WWII where Alan Turing and co would crack the Enigma code and help bring an end to the war by an estimated two years, saving many lives in the process.

To ensure absolute secrecy, no transmission ariels were allowed to protrude from the buildings as this might raise suspicions with passing bombers. Instead, hundreds of bike riders were tasked with getting important information and updates to those who mattered. The rural location meant it was less likely to be targeted, but Bletchley was chosen for more pragmatic reasons. It was smack bang in the middle of the main train route between Cambridge and Oxford, meaning the best mathematicians could be brought up quickly and at short notice. Workers were allocated to specific huts and teams were forbidden from talking about what they were doing both during and after the war or else face charges of treason and imprisonment. So while returning soldiers were glorified, the codebreakers could only say they had menial office jobs. Such integrity seems unimaginable today where we are encouraged to share every experience, as this article demonstrates.

75% of the work force were women and Alan Turing, a gay man, was prosecuted for homosexual acts in 1952. As punishment, he accepted a hormone treatment known as ‘chemical castration’ rather than go to prison. In 1954, aged 41, he committed suicide from cyanide poisoning. He was granted a pardon in 2013 by then PM Gordon Brown after a national campaign. In 2017, the ‘Alan Turing Law’ was introduced which retroactively pardoned men cautioned or convicted under historical legislation that outlawed homosexual acts. This feels particularly relevant today given the attack by the Trump administration on diversity and LGBTQ+ identities. To put this into context,  Slate reports Trump ‘fired the Black chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to replace him with a white retired general, who is both significantly less qualified for the job by military standards and ineligible for the role by those same military standards’. So much for fairness and meritocracy. Bletchley was largely shaped by a gay man and a 75% female workforce, demonstrating the value of a diverse workplace.      

Due to its historic links to computing, Bletchley was the location for the first AI Safety Summit in 2013. It currently has an exhibition on ‘The Age of AI’ which is why I visited with students from Nottingham Trent University. We are about to embark on a research trip to Europe to see how AI and creative technology can help better engage younger people in the political process and civic engagement. Our research is fed back to councillors from Ashfield, Bolsover, and Mansfield to help inform policy and investment and builds on a research trip last year where we visited the first AI Gallery in Europe.

I feel ambivalent about AI. As a writer, I understand that stories are incredibly personal and the result of our unique social situations. We write stories because we want to share our experiences of life with the world. AI does not have experience or empathy or history and so I am dismissive of any fiction it produces because it is not shaped by  personal experience and so lacks the most fundamental quality of persuasion, ethos – the credibility of the speaker – to borrow from Aristotle.

But I do find myself increasingly turning to programmes like Chat GPT as a personal research assistant when I need to find the answer to an immediate question that will help me with setting a scene, such as what wild flowers grow in the hedgerow at a specific times of the year. And as someone who produces a monthly video essay based on the letters of D.H. Lawrence, I sometimes have difficulties sourcing an image to match the script, such as for the video above. I used a programme like DeepAI to generate an image of a ‘squashed friend locus beetle’ which Lawrence was aghast at when he encountered it in a market in Mexico in November 1924. Quite rightly, you have to flag the video up as including ‘artificial or synthetic content’ on YouTube.

One area of interest at the Bletchley exhibition regarded AI Influencers. These, like their human equivalents, are mainly used for branding and selling products. But what if we were able to create an AI Influencer related to our research aim? A virtual assistant who could break down complex ideas to make the political process more accessible, or was able to flag up flaws in populist conspiracy theories, explicitly explaining how Tommy Robinson or Andrew Tate were not victims of the Deep State but people who have broken specific laws.

Part of the drive towards conspiracy theories is firmly grounded in reality. Lots of people, particularly white men, feel alienated and ignored, and so it is understandable – to an extent – why they may find belonging in spaces where they feel listened to. Any kind of AI support would need to address these nuances but perhaps introduce more positive or alternative means of belonging than those determined by social media algorithms.

If you have any suggestions about our research question, please do get in contact. And whether you like AI or not, visit Bletchley at some point in your life to pay respect to the many unknown people who dedicated their lives – without recognition – to help bring an end to the war.    

Bletchley Park, Sherwood Dr, Bletchley, Milton Keynes MK3 6EB. The AI exhibition is on till 2026. Visit the website here.     

Universities in crisis? Should student attendance be compulsory?

Image from Pixabay.

I have worked in education for fifteen years and during this time I’ve seen a steady decrease in attention spans and attendance. The smartphone is probably the reason for diminishing attention spans for all the reasons you might imagine. Attendance is more complicated and what I would like to focus on. I’ve done this as a list, just in case you’re reading this on your phone, and need to quickly scroll through it… 

1. Poverty

The cost-of-living crisis means that many students are now forced to work. The Higher Education Policy Institute (Hepi) found that 55% of students are now doing paid work. Research suggests this is creating inequalities, and therefore should be treated as an EDI issue.

2. Customers rather than students 

When the University of Bologna was formed in the 11th century, knowledge was deemed a ‘gift from God’ and so students did not pay fees. They paid a “collectio” (voluntary gift) and over time this led to a salary and the world we know today. But now tuition fees are so high, the power balance has shifted, transforming students into customers who are paying for a service and therefore can do what they like with that product. There are various implications for this retail industry approach which, I believe, is creating a culture of apathy that has removed individual responsibility from learning – by all involved in the process.

3. Knowledge on tap

From Chat GTP to a Google search engine, knowledge is now ‘on tap’ to be consumed at will. This is transforming how we learn. Knowledge is no longer something acquired through experience; a complex jigsaw puzzle assembled through life. Instead, it can be accessed as and when needed. sbobet88, the need to accumulate and accommodate knowledge has gone. Why go to a lecture when you can figure stuff out for yourself?

4. Digital learning rooms

Modules now have a digital and physical presence. Due to noble reasons, such as increasing access for disabled students, PowerPoints and readings should be uploaded a week in advance. Lectures are recorded, removing the need to get out of bed, and with the added benefit of saving money.

5. Quality

The perception that a lecturer is either boring, unknowledgeable, or will read from a script. This may happen on occasion, but in my experience, lecturers are passionate about what they teach or else they wouldn’t do it. But this could become an issue if expertise is replaced with facilitators, in which case ethos – the credibility of the speaker – is lost. But there needs to be individual responsibility too. Life isn’t always as you expect and how you deal with such situations is often more important than the problem itself.  

6. Mental health

A study by Kings College found mental health issues had tripled between 2016/17 and 2022/23. This means students are unable to attend lectures and require additional support. From my experience, universities are excellent at this and have dedicated specialists and teams.

7. Covid

I don’t really need to explain why being locked up and cut off from society has affected the psyche of a generation do I? No. Good. But one side effect of lockdown has been learning online, with the camera off, and with no need to engage with anyone else. This set a trend which has translated into lecture theatres, confirmed by a Times Higher Education report in 2022 that found 76 per cent of academics globally felt that attendance was lower than before the pandemic.

What to do?

Image from Pexels.

In the worst-case scenario, drops in student attendance may very well signify that universities have had their day. And perhaps they have. They may have outlived their original function and are no longer applicable to how we learn (and work) today.  But I don’t want to give up just yet so here’s a few suggestions.

1. Duty of care

Universities have a duty of care to students to ensure they get the best out of their education. You can’t just take the money and say it’s their choice. They are young and oblivious to the mounting debt that awaits them. There must be some kind of expected engagement threshold. One solution is introducing frequent assessment milestones. This could be quizzes, forums, or something that forces some level of engagement with the module. It’s not enough to miss an entire module and then write an essay at the end of it.

2. Sharing experience

There are many justifiable reasons as to why a young person feels anxious today. But life is a constant state of anxiety because none of us know what’s going to happen next. This means more needs to be done to install confidence and resilience in students. I do this in my modules by sharing my own experiences. In the 1980s there was AIDS restricting touch as Covid has done today. As with the Russian war with Ukraine, my generation experienced the Cold War and a nuclear catastrophe in Chernobyl in 1986. And as for cost of living and strikes, try living under Thatcherism. The point here is not one upmanship, rather showing how such fears affect every generation and you are testament that it’s possible to get through things.

3. Poverty

If you have to work, perhaps a degree is not for you. Consider an Open University course online that will fit around your schedule. This will save additional costs, such as renting. See Money Saving Expert for some useful tips on acquiring additional funding. 

4. Talking through ideas

University is about experience. Attending a lecture means you can immediately discuss issues with other students, even if it’s how dire the lecturer was, as it is the process of talking though ideas that helps complex ideas settle. I offer a ‘walk and talk’ tutorial along the Trent in Clifton. This is a more welcoming environment and means some students open-up in a way they may not do in a formal setting. From this, friendships emerge, and bonds are formed. It’s a lot harder to skip a lecture when you feel an emotional connection. 

5. Debate

University is a complex web of subject positions that form an overall discourse. Everything is about conversation. You put forward an argument and someone challenges you and this may affirm or negate your belief. If half the class is missing from a seminar that means less perspectives and a diluted debate. If this is not addressed by universities and attendance continues to dwindle, universities will lose their purpose, their integrity, and more people will turn to solitary means of discovering knowledge, as in the latest podcast.

6. Serendipity

You can buy any book you like, whenever you like, and it will be delivered to your door. But if you go to a charity shop, where you have no idea what you’ll find, you’ll spend longer perusing the shelves, reading the backs of books, contemplating what you want to read and why. You will be excited when you find something you didn’t expect and go home feeling a sense of excitement at your discovery. The same applies to attending sessions on campus. You will encounter different displays and events going on that week, perhaps catch a lecturer in their office and talk through something you didn’t know you wanted to talk about until you got there.  

 

These points skim the surface of a complex problem that has many sides. They’re not meant to be judgemental, rather outlining reasons and possible solutions. I do believe a threshold of attendance should be compulsory but I appreciate this is hard to enforce. Please do share your suggestions because there’s nothing more disheartening than an empty room.