Space contract extended

Arts Council England published its Creative Media Policy in July 2012 and within this, they’ve committed to a future legacy for The Space pilot project. This is fantastic news as it means that us guinea pigs producing content must be doing something right.

I’ve been so involved in the Sillitoe project that I’ve not really had time to reflect on what might happen with the content or how it would feel to see it all suddenly switched off on 31 October when the project finishes. So I’m even happier to announce that “both the Arts Council and BBC believe that it is imperative that The Space retains a digital presence after the ‘switch off’ date.” Both organisations have committed to maintaining their support for the project in its current form, and to extend the pilot to the 31 March 2013 in order to create more time to explore the potential of a permanent service.

There’s been lots of teething problems on the way. My main gripes would be videos not playing or freezing when being streamed, lack of interactivity between producer and consumer, errors in uploading content (such as missing vital paragraphs from text documents), font sizes that work on large screens but not so well on mobiles, and the lack of control that project editors have over the production and appearance of their work, but these are minor issues in the grand scale of things and all issues that can be resolved.
An example of this would be projects being limited to how many articles or files can be grouped together on a holding page. Now they’ve mastered this it removes an unnecessary restriction on editors who can concentrate on producing content that they deem best for their project rather than content that fits into the needs of the programmers. The holding page now looks fantastic and means that viewers can more easily be drawn to similar content. This is a massive progression and deserves a big thumbs-up given the scale of the project and the inevitable demands this entails.

The programmers and curators need time to sit back and reflect on how best to address the various issues outlined above but it would be a great pity for the content to simply disappear as I’m sure it could be tweaked as they go along which seems to be the general idea. Therefore there is also talk of a further option to renew this extension for a further six months, from the 1 April 2012 to the 30 September 2013. This decision will be taken in early January 2013. Needless to say we’ll be delighted to see Alan Sillitoe spend a little longer in the technological void.

The only downside to all of this is we might have to faff about a bit with existing contracts or in the worst case scenario, The Space may choose to remove our project. There is also the depressing matter of clause 3.8 which means we cannot financially benefit from the project until the end of 2015. As the whole purpose of the project was to raise awareness of our statue fund and none of this is for personal gain, it would be great if we could charge 50p per mobile phone app download. Hopefully we will be able to find a way to resolve this issue as well.

Sillitoe Trail event three: Raleigh

Raleigh logo at wikipedia.

Raleigh is the third stop on our Sillitoe Trail project for The Space and I’m delighted with how it’s turned out. I commissioned Pete Davis to talk to five former Raleigh workers so that we could build up an oral history of life working for the cycle manufacturer who celebrated their 125th anniversary this year. The rationale behind this was twofold: Firstly, oral histories gives our project greater diversity of content and so enable Saturday Night and Sunday Morning to be understood through a new prism and secondly, the testimonies enable us to compare the fictional portrayal of Arthur Seaton’s workplace with that of actual workers. Given that every member of Alan Sillitoe’s family worked at Raleigh I wouldn’t expect any inaccuracies.

Pete Davis is a local storyteller who has done this kind of work countless times and so was perfect for the role. A former fireman who himself worked at Raleigh (where he met his wife Sue) and a keen cyclist (his Raleigh bike has his name on it) he relished the role and was a consummate professional. When Pete records testimonies he writes them up and then sends copies off to the interviewees to sign off. The only real concern I had here was that some testimonies named specific people (sleazy bosses, workmates who drank on the job and various accounts of nepotism involving foreman). I removed these names to avoid being sued and because I didn’t want anything to be perceived as a personal attack. Pulling all of this content together was a short film from the British Council called How a Bicycle is Made which I was made aware of thanks to Andy Barrett, one of my mentors.

Getting the testimonies in early was a massive help as it quickly became apparent that there were some recurring themes– such as the slow eroding away of the Sturmey-Archer site and how disappointed workers were to be laid off or see parts imported. To balance this out I got two additional testimonies from management. Ann Hodkinson was a former team manager who I found particularly fascinating as in addition to being a lesbian (imagine controlling all of those men) she couldn’t read or write. This showed that all promotions weren’t down to nepotism as well as bringing in a female voice. The other was with Managing Director John MacNaughtan, who was able to give context to why parts were shipped in from abroad and how the manufacturing industry had to adapt to various changes in the global economy. If there’s one thing you quickly learn working with the BBC it’s trying to strike a balance and this is definitely one area in which my writing has improved.

Other articles included an introduction to Raleigh which was an excuse to celebrate factory workers up and down the country, the last day at the Sturmey-Archer site by Mark Patterson and a comparison of Saturday Night and Sunday Morning with Ben Hamper’s Rivethead, who worked on the production line for G.M. Motors.

My only disappointment is that all of the testimonies have been collated into one file which is far too text heavy. This dilutes the individual voices and I suspect may be a deterrent to your more casual visitor. Including more images would be one way of offsetting the text but unfortunately any images embedded in the text are far too small as it is, which is a pity given Paul Fillingham’s beautiful designs. But these things aside, I think we’ve done an excellent job in accurately representing factory life. Judge for yourself on The Space